Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: steve harris who wrote (192418)	6/30/2004 11:12:37 AM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (2) of 1576841

>Ten years. Ok, let's use your number. At what point do we do something and what do we do? 8 years? 9 years? That wasn't my point -- my point was that as long as we kept inspectors in Iraq, Saddam was 10 years away from having nukes, if he hadn't given up on 'em already. >Sounds like a good reason for the US to continue deploying the antimissile defense shield at a minimum. A pipe dream. >Now what would you suggest we do. Inspections failed. Well, they didn't really "fail" -- it seems there were no WMD in Iraq. But, what I'd do is keep soldiers with them so they couldn't be kicked out. I'd rather have inspectors in countries indefinitely than having to go to war. >Iraq, North Korea, Iran, any threat. It would seem it would be easier to pay now instead of later. How 'bout not at all? >Israel took care of Saddam's initial nuclear threat. I don't mind that approach. Pinpoint strikes are better than all-out regime change. Great intelligence makes those strikes possible and efficacious. I'd love it if we had a policy of bombing any nuclear reactor that Iran or North Korea were to build. That's actually a good solution! -Z

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next