Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (52666)	7/3/2004 2:56:34 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) of 793591

Well, then clue me in! I'll bet I've made at least a couple of hundred posts on this thread on this subject. In summary: I think that marriage is broken to the point of near meaninglessness. I have advocated turning marriage over to religious institutions because there quality controls are possible. If the state has to be involved at all, and I'm not sure why it does, then I suggest it sponsor civil unions instead. Failing that bit of creative destruction, and in the limited context of the current scenario, I think the best approach is civil unions for gays.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next