I found your reply most amusing.
Now let me get this straight. You describe "industrial real estate", using terms like "far more stable", "far more reliable and capable of ditributing (sic) risk", and "protecting your equity". You then feign amazement and indignation at the suggestion that this sounds like a description of a "safe haven"?
And then this gem: I merely made a suggestion, but in this idiotic universe, aka SI, the Theatre of the Absurd, such is grounds for your type of post, i.e. moronic, condescending and nonsensical
Moronic, condescending and nonsensical? Coming from the foremost practitioner of these genres, I suppose I should be flattered. That was a good one.
As is this one: Would I invest in a dead stale industrial market such as New Jersey (which I confess not to know the first thing about)?. That says it all. Grubb & Ellis ranks NJ as THE number 1 growth market over the next four years. Your're absolutely right, you know nothing about it.
grubb-ellis.com
My post also assumes the use of some common sense
Common sense meaning the ability to read your mind? Meaning the ability to understand that when you used the term "industrial real estate" in your original post, you of course meant small, multi-tenanted flex buildings in secondary and tertiary markets. Common sense should have told me that?
Your arrogance borders on the comical. Must be nice to have all the answers. |
