SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly.
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (1403)7/5/2004 6:07:43 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) of 4965
 
Dont lie about Kerry. Two years ago Kerry clearly said that because it is LIKELY Saddam had WMD's he needed to be DISARMED. Yet Kerry never suggested Saddam was an imminent threat. Kerry like most of us was also a bit hoodwinked by the Bush administration's faulty intelligence claims. In short, the Bushies lied and we gave them the benefit of the doubt, at first.

We were in the process of disarming Saddam in 2002 (Blix found more than Kay did, but all old virtually useless stuff) when Bush ordered the UN inspectors out and invaded as a matter of "national defense", scaring the American People with talk of "mushroom clouds". This despite zero evidence Saddam had nukes or was anywher near getting them.
Furthermore in 2001 Condi Rice is on film saying Saddam no longer posed a great threat to us.

As Powell warned Bush, "if you break it you own it". So now we own it. Thanks a lot GW. If GW had followed Kerry's sage advice we'd be much better off now.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News