SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (139113)7/7/2004 1:27:19 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
There is plenty of rhetoric against the United States, vowing vengeance for the first Gulf War. There are known designs for regional hegemony, and, as part of his party doctrine, the ultimate goal of an Arab ascendancy to challenge the West. Germany was not working against the US either, but at some point, people got a pretty clear idea that confrontation was inevitable. Of course, we could have let Britain go down, it would have without Lend- Lease, for certain. We could let Saddam dominate the Middle East, destroy Israel, and probably annihilate the Kurds and Shi'ites, but it is not the kind of world we care to live in. It made the most sense not to leave him in power, but to take him out while it was pretty easy to do so.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext