Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (139267)	7/8/2004 9:58:46 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Well...my belief and that of many others is that the decision was made way in advance and in absence of any intelligence (in both meanings of the word). Then a desperate search was made to find any "intelligence report" that promoted that decision. However that is just me. Assuming we take your position at face value, then we are left with three conclusions (1) the people involved are too incompetent not to recognize glaring mistakes that were clear to amateurs and were proven and published by main stream media. To be this wrong about something so important is a good justification for persecution for deliration of duties. (2) The people who read those intelligent reports and based their decisions upon it were equally incompetent not to see these same glaring mistakes that others found out easily and quickly. (3) Once the plagerization and fake documents were pointed out, the administration did not care enough to verify the rest of their facts and to place more competent people in charge. This last part goes towards my reasoning for the opinion I expressed in the first paragraph. ST

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next