"Here's a loaded question for you: Knowing the pregnancy put her life in peril, why did she not terminate the pregnancy? I know that there could be many reasons for this, but I'll still toss it out there.
There are many whys about this scenario.
1) Why were they having sex when they were sick?
2) Why are they having sex in a way that can impregnate the woman at all... BC pills are not 100% and there are many alternatives. Why didn't one or the other of them get snipped or tied for example.
4) In answer to your question..." why did she not terminate the pregnancy?
OH BOY!!! it would help to justify the abortion agenda and that is more important than the woman's well being or the baby's. And, we shouldn't be expecting anyone to take responsibility for their own actions. Have sex everywhere, anytime, in any fashion, with any body, ... problems??? well, that's what we have social welfare for ... right? It's the governments problem, or the Drs., or the tax payer's, or the sex partner's but I certainly shouldn't be inconvenienced in any way for MY CHOICE.
Maybe she has a conscience? But given that there was this type of legal option, don't you think the widower should be answering that question before filing suit? Or, at least Laz, the driver of this scenario? |
