SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (139343)7/8/2004 2:27:59 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
This argument has 4 parts:

1. Saddam had amassed bio-chemical weapons and a large military.

2. Saddam was deemed as too dangerous a person to posess bio-chemical weapons and huge stockpiles of conventional heavy weapons.

3. It was in US' best interest to defang Saddam.

4. Saddam's invasion of Kuwait provided the means to accomplish 3.

Now which of these items do you disagree with?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News