Seems that you only like to hear/read the things you like to hear/read
I refuse to contribute to neoNazi parties too. And the IRA, although I am of Irish background.
Do you have a problem with that too?
For your info, I am a world traveller --- a perpetual tourist or PT.
If we get lucky, you'll fall off the edge.
Whilst apparently professing to be a KIA,
To the best of my knowledge, I have never been killed in action.
While you insist on proofs, you don't care to provide any to debunk what you don't agree with.
I'm supposed to disprove your claims?????
Are you taking lessons in BS from AS?
BTW, "There's often more than what meets the eye" is just a general expression meaning that things often are not really what they appear to be, that there might be subtle or deliberately hidden stuff that need to be exposed and ferreted out to reveal the truth. Verily, there is usually more than one way to interpret any set of observations of a particular thing/issue.
That's a flatulent truism. Everything you know is wrong. Count on it. Quickly after Newton proposed his System of the World, discrepancies were found that wouldn't go away. Nevertheless, it was quite useful for quite a while. Those discrepancies led into relativity and qunatum theory. ANd they have their problems.
None of which makes any particular claim even approximately true.
For quite some time, lots of folks accepted the Bushies' line that there were WMDs in Iraq
I considered the evidence flimsy at best, and calling it "evidence" generous.
and therefore Saddam had to be removed from power.
Had the claims been true, that would not be a bad idea.
Now we know that the Bushies peddled this line in order to mobilise support for war against Iraq and regime change.
Or did they get bad intelligence that they believed? You really claim to know the answer to that? What level are you cleared at?
And Paul O'Neill, former Secretary of the Treasury has confirmed that Bush and his gang(sters) had in fact been wanting to invade Iraq from Day 1 long before 9/11. Yet for years, Bush insisted that 9/11 was an unprovoked attack and there was no justification for it.
Ah, did you just say SH was behind 911?
Again, I'd like to see your evidence. Because to the best of my knowledge, he was not.
Subsequent findings, however, have shown America's hands are not entirely clean on this matter. To me, Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11", for the time being at least, gives a fair exposé , and tellingly, it still has not yet been debunked;
No, merely sliced, diced, and thrown away.
Yeah! verily, there's more than what meets the eye!
Which, again, establish the truth of none of your claims. Just more conspiracy theory based on hot air. |
