We took another step towards a dictatorship here in America today. The house voted on an amendment to strip the Patriot Act of the provision to allow the government to pry into people's reading habits. Anytime there is a vote which junior opposes he calls down to the house and tells the leaders to keep the vote open long enough for the republican leadership to twist the arms of enough members who voted against junior's wishes till they tow the party line. As soon as the republicans had just enough votes to defeat the amendment they closed to vote, if they had need more votes they would have kept it open till they could force other republicans to change their vote.
This extra long voting period happened again today just like it did with the Medicare bill. It is a sad day for America which you will be hearing more about.
I watched it on C-SPAN, There were many democrats who got up and voiced their complaints about the unfairness of the republican majorities actions but none of the republicans had the nerve to speak to defend their actions save for the closer who pointed out that the majority makes the rules so that's the way it is going to be. These dirty tricks will have ramifications down the road when the democrats regain the majority.
_____________________
Politics - U. S. Congress
Bush Wins; House Leaves Patriot Act As Is
46 minutes ago Add Politics - U. S. Congress to My Yahoo!
By ALAN FRAM, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - House Republicans used an extra-long vote to derail a drive to weaken the USA Patriot Act, handing a campaign-season victory to President Bush (news - web sites) and angering Democrats and GOP conservatives who led the unsuccessful effort.
"You win some, and some get stolen," said conservative Rep. C.L. Butch Otter, R-Idaho.
He was a lead sponsor of the provision that would have prevented authorities from using the anti-terrorism law to demand information on book buyers and library users.
The proposal, which had drawn a veto threat from the White House, was defeated 210-210, with a majority needed to prevail. House GOP leaders extended what is normally a 15-minute roll call by 23 additional minutes. That was enough to persuade about 10 Republicans to switch their votes to no, including Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn.
Wamp said he changed his vote after being shown Justice Department (news - web sites) documents asserting that terrorists have communicated over the Internet via public library computers.
"This new world we live in is going to force us to have some constraints," Wamp said.
As the amendment's prospects shifted to defeat from an apparent victory, Democrats chanted, "Shame, shame, shame." The tactic was reminiscent of last year's House passage of the Medicare overhaul measure. Then, GOP leaders held the roll call open for an extra three hours until they got the votes they needed.
The House vote came amid Bush administration warnings of an increased risk of attacks this summer and fall because terrorists may try to disrupt the November's elections.
It also came just four months ahead of an election in which the conduct of the fight against terrorism promises to be a central issue.
Besides successfully fending off the effort to weaken the law, the veto threat underscored Bush's determination to strike an aggressive stance on law enforcement and terrorism.
The House has voted before to block portions of the nearly 3-year-old law, but Congress has never succeeded in rolling back any of it. Yet neither has Bush succeeded in his quest to expand some of its powers.
Supporters of the law said the Patriot Act has been a valuable tool in anti-terror efforts. The law, enacted in the weeks after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, gave the government stronger powers to conduct investigations and detain people.
"I would say, in my judgment, that lives have been saved, terrorists have been disrupted, and our country is safer" because of the act, said Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He is under consideration by Bush to become the next CIA (news - web sites) director.
Otter and Rep. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., led the effort to block one section of the law that lets authorities get special court orders requiring book dealers, libraries and others to surrender records such as purchases and Internet sites visited on a library computer.
The lawmakers contended the provision undermines civil liberties and threatens to let the government snoop into the reading habits of innocent Americans.
"We are all in that together," Sanders, one of Congress' most liberal lawmakers, said of the anti-terror effort. "In the fight against terrorism, we've got to keep our eyes on two prizes: the terrorists and the United States Constitution."
Thursday's showdown was over an amendment to a $39.8 billion measure financing the Justice, Commerce and State departments for next year, which passed, 397-18. The Senate has yet to write its version of the bill.
Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., read a letter from the Justice Department stating that "as recently as this past winter and spring, a member of a terrorist group closely affiliated with al-Qaida" had used Internet services at a public library. The letter mentioned no specifics, Wolf said.
"If we can stop what took place in my area," said Wolf, whose district is near the Pentagon (news - web sites), which was a Sept. 11 target, "then I want to stop that, because we've gone to enough funerals."
Critics of the Patriot Act argued that even without it, investigators can get bookstore, library and other records simply by obtaining subpoenas or search warrants if a judge agrees the items are relevant to a case.
The Justice Department, however, says that it is actually more difficult to get such information in international terrorism or spying cases. Under the Patriot Act, the government must first prove to a special court that the items are needed for one of these specific investigations and that the probe is not based solely on activities protected by the First Amendment.
story.news.yahoo.com |
