Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mph who wrote (14198)	7/9/2004 3:27:32 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) of 14610

As for your reference to Wesley Clark. Didn't you change it to Clark from Moore after you read my response? If I am incorrect about that, I apologize in advance. I changed nothing. Your apology is noted and accepted. Lorne has just posted a link that confirmed my impression of the reasons the Democrats objected to Denton as a July 4 speaker. It provides all you need to answer this exceedingly uncomplex hypothetical -- but in fact, you need nothing more than the question itself, it stands alone: Simple Question for mph: If the Democrats proposed Wesley Clark to give the talk, and screened F.9/11 at the ceremony or immediately after at a celebration of the occasion of July 4 this election year, would you think Republicans would have a right to insist that this was inappropriate, and that a more non-partisan, undivisive Independence Day celebration day should be designed? It's a simple question, and nothing about Denton is needed for you to answer it. I can answer it now: The Republicans would have good cause to object and ask for input into the July 4 program. Here is some detail located by lorne. Message 20295247

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next