Thanks Don, and I agree with your excellent assessment. Indeed, I would go further.
I am concerned whether one is looking at information or disinformation? Whether the whole movie is, in fact, an attempt to cover a few truths with many untruths or half-truths and thereby disguise what really happened and so confuse the observer. I say this because, as you mention, so many important facts have been omitted. After two hours of rather tedious watching one would have expected every aspect to have been covered. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Clearly, the central point of the movie is to link the Oklahoma bombing to the first WTC bomb and then to 9-11 and then to attribute all to some mythical NWO group whose whole intent is to enslave or destroy us for some absurd purpose. There is also an attempt to incriminate Iraqis/Muslims all along the line. The logical assumption is that these must be the people in the NWO.
The implication of all this is that every US administration is/was involved in subversive activities against the American people and for the benefit of the NWO. This must be so since no proper investigation is ever carried out to determine who is behind the series of heinous acts. Indeed, wherever possible, government agencies in the various administrations attempt to cover-up and obfuscate any attempt to get to the bottom of the various attacks. The argument presented is, because every administration is dishonest, there must be a common purpose to the crimes and a common agency behind them.
The conclusion is, indeed, a most awful situation where every elected government in the US is subservient to the whims of a nefarious secret organization rather than to the needs of the people. In the circumstances, since Ivor Jones gives no advice as to what the people should do, one wonders what the point of the movie was? Other than to frighten the people -- or deceive them?! |
