SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (51050)7/14/2004 4:17:52 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) of 89467
 
Along with your demonstrated lack of ability to comprehend or respond within context, you seem to be unable to answer a direct question. And, your recent postings seem contradictory.

You posted:

”lolol.... well said”

…in response to coug’s post where he stated:

” NEVER AGAIN challenge, … independent thinkers.” Post 51004

Coug indicated that he considered the practice of challenging people who think as he does to be a ‘bother’ which should never again be tolerated. You seemed to support the notion of forbidding challenges in your response of Post # 51005.

So, I asked you (repeatedly) if you want to forbid the practice of challenging ideas.

You now seem to be declaring that you personally are a challenger of ideas. That was not really the context of the question. The context of the question had to do with whether or not you want to forbid others to engage in the practice of challenging ideas.

btw, am I challenging you too much?

best regards,
jowl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News