(fortunately, I am not responsible for your misperceptions and ignorance!)
Unfortunately for you, you are responsible for your own.
You appear to have an irredeemable blind spot in your thinking... (not too surprising since you state that 'nothing is alive' and 'there is no knowledge'... all while you type away on your computer.... LOL!)
Uh, typing on a computer has no more value and ultimate knowledge than orbiting planets and falling rocks. It is just another thing that happens amongst dead objects.
I used the commonly accepted definitions for Atheism and Agnosticism --- as you well know! You cannot muddy the waters by re-defining the terms.
I redefined nothing. I employed the real meaning of atheism consistently, even employing the meaning that atheists themselves commonly used to define themselves. You, on the other hand, were babbling in pure ignorance – as usual.
You held that scientists cannot believe in a God. You are ignorant, and lying.
I said that your sort of scientists cannot have real faith.
So, you have no objection to OTHER PEOPLE'S actions in this regard!
Only where they influence me. If they take place without influencing me, then it is fine. If I should form an alliance and certain actions influence that alliance, then they influence me and are therefore my business. Otherwise, I have no concern for them – at all.
I have NEVER made any effort to 'force' you do do anything, nor shall I!
The very moment you support laws that infringe upon my right in nature to be only what I am in nature, you support that which aims to force me to do something. You are therefore the problem. I only wish for the freedom to maintain my identity – not your foreign sodomitic, filthy and utterly inhuman identity.
Sounds like you are the 'ignorant one' if you persist in insanely believing that I am trying to 'force' you to do anything... particularly to terminate pregnancies, use condoms, etc., etc.
The very moment you support government might that aims to infringe upon my right in nature to be only what I am in nature, you support that which aims to force me to do something.
I couldn't care less what you do --- so long as you don't harm others.
Then stop taking my money to support your utter filthy worldview. Murder children and shove your penis in guy’s rectums on your own dime.
Whatever, Johannes. I wouldn't give a plug nickel for you either. (I'm not away of any market for religious bigots, whereby a monetary value could be affixed, LOL!)
You have no more value in nature than a cup of snot. Try to find objective value and you will fail. It just does not exist here. All is meaningless.
No. I never said 'God was beyond nature' (do YOU believe that God is not expressed in the natural world??????), and I never said that anyone --- scientist or other --- must 'treat him as if he does not exist'. You persist in setting Straw Men up to attack, while ignoring my actual words. Not too smart.
hehe. You now sense the godlessness of your view and are trying to avoid what must follow. I never said you said God was beyond nature. You are a heathen and would, of course, not say such a thing. Your science is godless because it chooses to limit itself only to that which is in nature. It calls this choice “testability.” If God is beyond nature, it is therefore unattached to God. It is godless.
And if [the scientist] doesn't [ignore God] he doesn't.
And he also is not your brand of scientist, but is a real scientist.
YOUR 'implication', not MINE, idiot. Another Straw Man, you are attacking something I never said.
hehehe. It is a wondrously interesting thing to see heathens being forced toward their vacuous positions. When this happens, they almost always run from them as you are.
LOL! Apparently you really like that lie [that my science is godless]]! CHUCKLE.
You can run, Buddy, but you cannot hide.
Are you RETRACTING your ridiculous lie that 'science doesn't rely upon empirical methods', or are you merely riffing on your latest Straw Man argument... 'crappy magic'?
You cannot hide, Buddy, however much you keep running from yourself.
If it's merely another illogical, off topic tirade you are engaged in (and you are content to let your ridiculous lie about empirical methods lie (snip)…
Catch your breath. Stop running and stop trying to hold on the lie that you now know is a lie.
D-R-E-A-M O-N, oh Great Mystic (who claims that 'there is no knowledge' and 'we are all dead').
You have no more value than sand. This proves your dead state.
Let me know how that's coming along (when your Mystics split off from the United States of America and ignite the civil war).
Well of course I never claimed such a thing will in fact happen. I think that if there is going to be your version of a separation of Church and state, then you ought to make the thing a true separation – rather than this hypocritical crap you are involved in currently.
So... you DID overstate things a bit.... You do NOT live in a pre-technological environment, not at all.
I never said I did. I simply didn’t refute your statement about a pre-technological environment.
I see....
You are in fact quite blind. |
