SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (140265)7/15/2004 10:05:47 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
<<<There are many, many explanations, in depth, by Constitutional scholars, including law professors, history professors, political science professors, members of Congress, specialized journalists, etc.>>>

True I don't have the academic credentials of some of the above, but in that regard, I am a level with perhaps 90% of the electorate.

As LBJ once said, I may not be a connoisseur and can't tell you all the ingredients, but I know the difference between chicken sh*t and chicken salad.

It is very clear that the intent of the Founding Fathers was there to be a separation of powers and that only Congress has the power to declare war.

I am well aware there may be emergency situations where the President may have to act quickly.

But, recently Presidents have abused this rationale and Congress has basically rolled over the intent of the Founding Fathers where they effectively are not there to do the due diligence to declare war.

If Congress thinks that that part of the principle of separation of power is no longer applicable, they should rewrite the Constitution.

BTW, I doubt there is anywhere near unanimty of your "experts" on this subject.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext