SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jttmab who wrote (140550)7/16/2004 8:01:39 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
The ACLU made it an issue, and made the arguments that swayed the Court. Of course, the Supreme Court is not irrelevant. But my comment was an aside on the ACLU.

Yes, refreshing myself on the details, I agree that it was a speech issue, as well.

Actually, the reasonable criterion seems to me to weigh the potential for the eruption of violence in a given circumstance against the authority's ability to provide police protection. I am not suggesting a "victim's veto", merely prudent concern, similar to that which establishes restrictions based on traffic and other mundane considerations.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News