SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sea_biscuit who wrote (54941)7/18/2004 9:11:22 PM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) of 793752
 
Well, it's true, you didn't exactly say the U.S. should send:
"exactly 140,000 troops to Afghanistan" - you implied more than 140,000 U.S. troops should be in Afghanistan (the 140,000 that are in Iraq, and the 10,000 that are already there).

Message 20297821

"Do you know that Spain has actually increased its troop count? Guess where? Afghanistan. That's where the 140,000 US troops should have been." - Dipy, July 10, 2004

re: "I didn't say that the US should have sent exactly 140,000 troops to Afghanistan." - Dipy July 18, 2004

And that's why I asked you, how do you expect that the U.S. will supply 140,000 troops in Afghanistan.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext