Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (54944)	7/18/2004 9:27:42 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) of 793559

As for the portion of the report which applies to Wilson, it's my understanding the Dems refused to agree to that. All the FACTS that refute Wilson are in the main report. That means his report from Niger that supported the yellowcake story, his statement that Cheney had read the report and his statements that his wife had nothing to do with it. He admitted on CNN yesterday that he was wrong about Cheney being briefed. These were SIGNED OFF ON by everyone. Your wonderment at this is due to the fact that you refuse to admit they are true. It really gets difficult to deal with you when you make these types of unsupported statements that are not true. The points brought up in the schmidt article by Josh do not refute these points. They are side issues that have nothing to do with the evidence that makes Wilson a liar. I have posted the evidence to you over and over. I am getting to the point of believing you are not serious about your objections, but are merely trying to provoke me.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next