SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (55063)7/19/2004 3:24:57 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793572
 
The problem is that there is, evidently, a dispute as to what "the facts" are.

No, the report plainly states the dispute is over the conclusion, not the facts. I gave you the facts about Plame's recommendation of Wilson on page 453. And the facts on Wilson on page 82. There is no dispute about what "the facts" are.

So, we are now in agreement that the Dems refused to sign the portion of the report having to do with the Wilson stuff.

No, dammit, They admitted the facts on Plame on page 453. The report that I quoted says so. The Dems refused to sign the conclusion on Plame.

And the Dems did sign the page 82 part about Wilson's report when he got back. So they admitted the facts on Wilson on page 82. That is in the body of the report.

Dance all you want. It's obvious the Dems, both Senators and staff, admitted the facts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News