Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (55318)	7/20/2004 10:03:27 PM
From: MrLucky	Read Replies (1) of 793939

Berger knows the rules for accessing the archives. The rules apply to all users of the archives. He is not excepted. His "decision" to take documents with him was not happenstance. He isn't BS-ing anyone. He called it a technical violation of the rules. Really? The higher the level of authority (and Berger was near the top) the more unacceptable are his actions. Berger says he was sloppy. If I were to take him at his word, I would add arrogant because he decided the archival rules did not apply to him or his old boss. If this is an example of his sloppy work, it is no wonder that OBL was not nailed when Sudan offered him to the clinton administration. Why did he do it? Besides him who knows? CNN said it was for the clinton administration testimony before the Panel. Guess that means clinton, himself, as it was he who was to testify before the commission. Of course, there is gore. The other alternative is that Berger was intent on protecting his role as security boss under clinton. So, for me it boils down to: 1. He was sloppy. 2. He was protecting someone or something from the sunlight. 3. He is an arrogant jerk. I'll go with door number 2. Your turn.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next