This is what Bushies are trying to cover up, that they could have stopped 9-11 but did nothing.
You've been hanging out with rayduray at the conspiracy nut websites again, haven't you?
So of course they try to blame it on CLinton who was out of power almost a year by then. msnbc.msn.com;
Thanks for the link. Here's an interesting tidbit:
"By January 2000, U.S. intelligence had picked up the trail of two of the 19 men who would eventually hijack the four jetliners in September 2001. They were among top al-Qaida operatives who gathered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, for a planning meeting. But the CIA lost track of the hijackers when they left, and the agency failed to warn the FBI that one of them had a valid visa to enter the United States."
Let's see . . . January 2000 . . . yes, Clinton WAS still in power then.
But wait, there's more:
"The most significant signal appears to have come in April 2000, when Niaz Khan, a Briton of Pakistani heritage, walked into the FBI’s office in Newark, N.J.
Khan told agents that he had been trained by al-Qaida, the terrorist network that carried out the Sept. 11 attacks, and that there would be a hijacking in the United States or on a U.S. airline."
And later, perhaps distracted by efforts to get algore elected . . .
"By fall 2000, U.S. intelligence had located some of bin Laden’s training sites. A Predator drone spy plane brought back pictures of al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan, as well as of a tall man in flowing white robes, who is now believed to have been bin Laden himself. But no military assets were on standby to take a shot at him."
Thanks again for posting. That was quite interesting. LOL. |
