SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (55441)7/21/2004 8:21:13 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793900
 
Democats Block Seventh Judicial Nominee
Captain Ed

Senate Democrats hauled out their filibuster for the seventh time to block a Bush nominee from a fair floor vote for confirmation, this time unhappy with the nominee's environmental record. William Myers is the latest nominee sent packing by the Democrats, who this time didn't even bother arguing that Myers would endanger the Constitution, their heretofore consistent argument against Bush nominees:

The vote on Myers, who was accused by Democrats of hostility to environmental causes, was 53 to 44, seven short of the 60 needed to force action on his nomination to the San Francisco-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. He was the seventh Bush choice for the federal bench to be stopped by a Democratic filibuster. ...
The vote was less about Myers than "a reflection of special interest group disdain for policies favored by farmers, ranchers, miners, the Bush Interior Department or anyone else who advocates balanced uses of western lands," said Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah).

Previous filibusters have centered around Constitutional issues regarding abortion rights, equal protection, and free-speech decisions or opinions cited by Democrats in their unprecedented use of filibustering nominations. This time, the issues were nakedly partisan and strictly political. Such a display of naked politicization of the judicial nomination process should shame the Democrats, who have turned this session into the most radical Senatorial opposition to any American executive in the history of our nation, excluding the Civil War. It's now quite clear that Democrats will never allow any nominee to pass through the Senate until they subject him or her to policy litmus tests -- an abhorrent and corrupting practice which forces judicial nominees into the unethical position of committing to ruling in certain ways before ever hearing a case.

Is this what the Democrats think of an independent judiciary?

Fortunately, in November, we have the opportunity to correct this perversion of the Constitution. Identify those Democratic Senators who are up for re-election, like Tom Daschle, Barbara Boxer, and others, and help their opponents unseat them. You can find links to the requisite sites through Hugh Hewitt's website.

Posted by Captain Ed at July 21, 2004 06:20 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
captainsquartersblog.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext