Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neeka who wrote (55580)	7/22/2004 2:55:48 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) of 793897

Make that a ditto, M~ HOW DARE Berger and his apologists blame someone else for HIS illegal behavior??? And to blame the White House is simply laughable....Except no one is laughing. Except Clinton, of course. (Last night, Clinton thought this was a funny story)... And of course, Clinton said he had known of the situation for several months. Wonder if he told the Kerry camp? The real question is WHY was Berger taking the 1999 reports (the after reports that Richard Clarke wrote)...not only once but twice. What was he trying to hide, and who was he trying to protect???? And the even bigger question is WHY was Berger vetting his own papers and those of Clinton for the 9-11 Commission??? What other things did he "inadvertently" steal from the National Archives, and what papers did he destroy????????

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next