Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (55478)	7/22/2004 9:24:39 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) of 793840

<<<Berger has confessed to a criminal act. He claims his motives are pure. So do most criminals.>>> He has confessed to being careless and taken some copies of classified documents that he should not have. This situation has been under review since October of last year. When he had asked the Justice Department what was going on, he was told that perhaps there would be no charges. If this is not the case, Berger should be and will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. If what he says is true, then there has also been another serious crime committed - perhaps even more serious than the crime Berger committed. And that is, some one leaked this story two days before the 911 committee was to release their report to obfuscate real serious national security issues. Life and death issues. In any case, what happened is a serious matter. Either Sandy Berger is hiding evidence that is useful in National Security matters, or someone is trying to play politics and trying to obfuscate serious national security issues. I hope we can get to the bottom of this issue. One way or the other.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next