SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (195767)7/25/2004 11:54:42 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1572767
 
Ted, Let me see.......a pyramid scheme? You put money into a retirement fund so that you will have some income when you retire.
I thought we covered this before.

#reply-19210588

SS is indeed a Ponzi scheme, but that's the way it was set up in the first place. It worked back in 1935 because the ratio of payees to beneficiaries was a lot larger than it is now. People are living longer, but the retirement age is still 65, the same as when SS was set up back in the beginning.


Ponzi or pyramid schemes.........those terms mean nothing to me. The original intent of the system sounds reasonable but like you said people are living longer and there are less payees. The problem may well correct itself as the baby boomer cohort dies off. If not, then just fund the shortfall each year. I'm sure that proposal will make every go ballistic, screaming socialism at the top of their lungs, but its really the only reasonable one. I hardly think 'playing the stock market' makes good sense.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext