SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (51794)7/26/2004 7:26:13 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
Hawk, I'm pleased to see Russia part way to accepting that Saddam's debts to the USSR/Russia are not Iraq's debts and that they are accepting the idea of writing off half of them. They are half way there. Now for the other half.

Asking Saddam's victims to pay back loans made to Saddam to suport his power over his victims is simply insane.

The idea of lending to a country is a bad one. Even democratic countries can reasonably repudiate loans as it's the governments who incur the debt. The opposition to said government shouldn't have to pay for their follies.

People lending to countries should not. I am currently taking my chances by holding US$, which is me lending my money to Uncle Sam and Uncle Al, which is foolish, but I hope is worth the bet. I will not be surprised to see eventual repudiation of the debt, by rapid pixelation of new $$$$ to stave off financial glitches, as has always been done in the past.

If the voters decide to cancel old US$ and issue a new one, I won't be surprised and won't expect them to repay the debt. Though I'll appreciate it if they do.

I realize this isn't quite the same thing as a loan, but it's still credit on the promise of material goods and services being delivered some day.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext