Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (57096)	7/30/2004 3:07:09 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) of 793707

The job is to make it as efficient as possbile, where there is a minimum of waste and abuse. There was a time when I thought that centralized control was the most efficient approach, minimizing waste and abuse. It seemed so logical. Why have fifty states reinventing the wheel for something that could be done by a single government bureaucracy. Why have different individuals inventing things and trying new processes most of which will fail when we could get the best and the brightest, plunk them down in Washington, and have them decide the optimal way to queue up patrons in a restaurant or a hospital, for example? I used to scratch my had when people said that capitalism was efficient. How could that be efficient when so much is invested in business that fail? Waste all over the place. Well, I lived and learned. Big systems are usually out of date by the time they're installed. The loudest lobby doesn't produce the best ideas. No one can think of everything. Bureaucratic overhead will sap any system. And big systems are almost impossible to turn around. Nothing efficient about that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next