I have no problem taking the events of 9/11 a step further and examining the evidence (conspiracy) that there was some sort of demolition that took the buildings down. I saw them collapse on TV, and even the commentator speculated that it looked like some sort of demolition. There is other evidence that a demolition took place. In any case, it was very strange that the materials were rushed off site and melted in NJ so quickly. You'd think they'd want to examine the evidence, unless they really don't, which would point towards a conspiracy.
But, I'm going to try to stick to the available evidence as much as possible, and that evidence points overwhelminingly to the fact that there were in fact planes that were flown into the WTC towers on 9/11/01. Now, whether they were the hijacked planes or some other planes or remote controlled planes, I'm not going to speculate on, but they were planes. Many thousands of people witnessed these events and recorded them. Perhaps they were used as a diversion to take the buildings down with explosives, that is possible, but talk of no planes being flown into the WTC on 9/11 is getting into the rhelm of looniness. I think Gustave is going to go on my ignore list as he's either a troll (posting useless nonsense to muck up the thread) or he's not in touch with reality. I'm not sure which is the case, but he's going on ignore really soon, as his contributions are negligible. |
