SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (194507)8/3/2004 5:41:59 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1576348
 
re: What is radically different about Bush's tone, words, or policies??

The policy of preemption.


This is probably your best point, but it also comes under radically different circumstances.

The marginalization of our institutions, especially NATO and the UN.

They are not much more or less marginalized then they where before.

The total disregard of financial responsibility, especially as we approach the retirement of baby boomers.

Poor fiscal discipline is nothing new let alone radically different.

Turning most of the world from totally sympathetic to our cause into thinking we are the most dangerous country in the world.

The opinions of other people are not the actions or policies of Bush. If we assume that this has indeed happen it still wouldn't be an answer to the question.

Not getting revenge for 9/11.

1 - Not an answer to the question.

2 - Not true, there has been plenty of revenge.

3 - What would you, or Clinton, or Gore, or Kerry or anyone else have done differently and how would the results have been greatly different and more positive it terms of getting revenge for 9/11.

800+ plus soldiers deaths, 10,000+ Iraqi civilian deaths.

Again not an answer to the question, and also much smaller numbers then in the wars that many previous presidents have gotten the US in to.

Deficit producing tax cuts where 80% of the benefit goes to the richest 10% of the people.

1 - The real deficit producers where the spending increases and the economic slowdown that had already started under Clinton and was accelerated by 9/11. Even if you assume that tax cuts cause no additional economic activity and thus no tax revenue (a silly assumption) the tax cuts would only be a small part of the deficit.

2 - Tax cuts, and deficits for that matter are nothing new. And since the rich pay most of the taxes the benefits of tax cuts go mostly to the rich again nothing new.

Sowing fear for political gain

1 - Nothing new or radically different.

2 - You haven't even established that Bush has done this.

Other then Iraq there really is nothing vaguely radical about Bush's policies, and even Iraq really isn't radically different from some of the other wars the US has been involved in.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext