So, what's YOUR point in maintaining that planes actually hit something on 911?
My point is to stick to the facts as much as possible. And the facts overwhelmingly demonstrate that planes hit the WTC on 9/11/01, I haven't seen anything at all to the contrary that would convince that those aren't the facts. I don't want to go off into looney land. Most people think talk of the WTC being demolished by bombs instead of fires is getting into looneyland, but at least there is some evidence to support that claim. It can be discussed in a rational manner. As far as the claim that no planes hit the WTC on 9/11, where's the evidence? And, what's the point of making this relatively meaningless assertion? Is it because you are in looneyland yourself? Again, I ask, what's your point? I know people who witnessed the planes hit the WTC, there are dozens of films of the planes hitting the WTC, 1,000s of other eyewitnesses. What's your point of disputing this part of the 9/11 events? If you can in some way establish that planes did not in fact hit the WTC on 9/11/01, what difference does it make?
Sure, some of the details of 9/11 are kind of grey, like what exactly hit the Pentagon? How many people witnessed a 767 hitting the Pentagon on 9/11/01? How many clear films of the plane hitting the Pentagon are there? What does the damage demonstrate? That's a part of 9/11 that perhaps you could make the case that a missle or some military jet hit the Pentagon. At least it wouldn't automatically be relegated to the looney bin.
Sorry, but the facts aren't on your side in regards to planes not hitting the WTC on 9/11/01. I don't know anyone else trying to make that claim, either on the Internet or in print. If you sincerely believe that no planes hit the WTC on 9/11/01, please explain why this is important? If you can't I'm going to have to put you on ignore, as I think your not in touch with reality. I can't waste my time with nonsense supported by nothing but some loon on the Internet, about no planes hitting the WTC. |
