Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (53028)	8/8/2004 11:40:19 AM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (2) of 89467

Unbelievable! There is moral law. And, even though I surmise that you view the Bible as a fairy tale book, did you know that most current laws were based on moral laws that came from it? Ever hear "an eye for an eye?" There is no inconsistency in my view of supporting the death penalty for moral and legal law breakers and opposing convenience abortion as completely wrong. My arguments against abortion are clearly that I view it (when used for convenience) as both morally wrong, and it SHOULD be legally wrong. When I use the term, "broke the law", I refer to both the moral and legal aspects. If you cannot see the VAST difference in these two types of killing, then we have nothing more to discuss. I remain, SOROS

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next