SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 270.98-0.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob Jagow who wrote (4468)8/24/1997 8:35:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson   of 213177
 
Bob; I saw it in a PR blurb somewhere that the batwing was able to do it??
As you might know, if you reduce the size of all the transistors/lines etc of a design by 50% then you reduce the area by .50x .50 or to 25% of the original size. Since heating is area dependent and frequency dependent a smaller area will make the same heat at a higher temperature, thus opening the way for higher speeds, and more chips per silica disc. These two factors drive the rush to smaller geometries. I think AMD has a smaller geometry than Intel, as they have always been better chip designers than Intel as the K6 shows.
(the success of the K6 has a lot to do with Intels recent price drop)
Since AMD is only 5% of the size of Intel vis-a-vis CPU production rate, for every $1 they want to deprive AMD of by pre-emptive price cuts, they lose $20. But they are doing it, as if they let AMD make a year or two fat profits, they will soon ramp up to 25-30 of the Pentium capacity, and they will then lose more.
Who else makes the Apple chips other than Motorola(not the ones that modify Motorola dice)
Bill
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext