SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sea_urchin who wrote (7777)8/17/2004 4:46:57 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (2) of 20039
 
Re: In my opinion, the fact that the official flights AA11 and AA77 did not exist on 9-11 does not rule out the use of aircraft, certainly in the case of "AA11",...

As John Kaminski put it: "...Is it a plane? Was it added to the film? Were there any eyewitnesses who actually saw the impact? I don't know of any."

Again, let's face it: no planes ever hit anything.... Although it's likely that the USAF did fly a Boeing 737 around --just to hallucinate "ear-witnesses" in NYC that "airliners crashed into the WTC towers".... After all, that's the main reason the conspirators had to pull down both towers: there were no exit-hole footprints!! That's also why all videos/pics of the WTC's South(-West) side were censored. Think about it: how could sane people believe that an airliner at 500 mph can crash into the WTC's North wall... with no damage on the opposite/south wall??!?! LOL... The shock wave of the crash alone would have blasted off windows on at least three floors.

But there were no planes --only planted bombs. And the 911 conspirators didn't plant bombs to simulate the crashes' exit footprints. They knew the WTC towers would be pulled down by mininukes immediately after the "crashes" anyway.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext