SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ak who wrote (204)8/25/1997 11:20:00 AM
From: Ken Merwin   of 1267
 
This is all fine and dandy; however, for me, at least, it does not get to the core of the issue, re: the placement of a bounty or reward prominently displayed on your web site.

It seems that the meat of your response is in # 2, 3 & 4. Your last sentence in # 2:

"Investors asked to consider Pluvia's analysis and opinions about PLSIA have a right to know of any vested interests that might fuel his agenda."

I'm sorry, maybe I'm missing something but since when have you been given the role of "Papa" here on SI? You set out one or two possible scenarios here about "Pluvia" (absent from your reward information on your web site) as justification for this whole action but my gut feeling on this is you're really trying to put forth a defense along the lines of a "good guy trying to protect us poor SI people who hang our $$$ on every word Pluvia says about PLSIA, etc.". You're not even a member of SI by your own admission.

I'm not swayed by it Sir.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News