SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Rage Against the Machine

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who started this subject8/20/2004 4:18:47 PM
From: James Calladine of 1296
 
Faith-Based Missile Defense
Brad DeLong
August 20, 2004

From Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal:

Why Oh Why Are We Ruled by These Liars? (Missile "Defense" Deployment Edition)

DefenseTech bangs its head against the wall as it contemplates the enormous waste of money that is the Bush administration's "deployment" of a not-working missile defense system:

Defense Tech: FAITH-BASED MISSILE DEFENSE: President Bush put a whole lot of stock in "faith-based" initiatives to solve domestic problems... taking the same approach to military matters. Yesterday, President Bush campaigned at a Boeing plant, promoting his missile defense system.... "We say to those tyrants who believe they can blackmail America and the free world, 'You fire, we're going to shoot it down,'" he said. But... [t]he anti-missile system's effectiveness is a matter of faith... the Defense Department scrapped some of the $10 billion per year program's most important tests....

"Thomas P. Christie, director of the Pentagon's office of Operational Test and Evaluation, said a shortage of testing data would likely make it difficult for him to assess the system's effectiveness ahead of any deployment this year," the Washington Post noted earlier this year. "He expressed concern about the small number and relatively simple nature of flight tests, noting they have used the same course each time and have relied on surrogates and prototypes for key elements still under development."

Slate's Fred Kaplan translates:

In the past six years of flight tests, here is what the Pentagon's missile-defense agency has demonstrated: A missile can hit another missile in mid-air as long as a) the operators know exactly where the target missile has come from and where it's going; b) the target missile is flying at a slower-than-normal speed; c) it's transmitting a special beam that exaggerates its radar signature, thus making it easier to track; d) only one target missile has been launched; and e) the "attack" happens in daylight.

...The situation isn't likely to change any time soon. The next stages of the Pentagon's missile defense plan call for building defenses that can catch enemy rockets before they take off. But in a study last year, the American Physical Society said that couldn't be done with current or near-term American anti-missile technology. So it's no surprise that when the Defense Department tried to show off its anti-missile training program to reporters earlier this year, the wargame had to be rigged in order for the good guys to win.

tompaine.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext