EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.0000500

0.0%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mel Spivak who wrote (1253)	8/25/1997 2:06:00 PM
From: GRC	of 2383

Mel, The original LEXIS was a subsciption service. However, to avoid being anticipating prior art you must find a claim limitation that was not provided by LEXIS. Thus, just because Lexis was a subsription service does not mean it can't be anticipating prior art. You have to find something in the claims that isn't in LEXIS. That is why I looked at the austhorization code. LEXIS didn't have an authorization code for each document (there was a sign on ID & password but that originated with the local computer). Once signed on, you had access to everything. If you or anyone else can point out other differences I would appreciate it. By differences I mean something in the claims that wasn't in LEXIS. GRC

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next