SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (14333)8/25/2004 2:04:38 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (2) of 90947
 
Let me clear this up for you. There are three possibilities for the events to have occured; Either the President lied before Kerry was in Cambodia, the President lied at the exact same time as Kerry was in Cambodia or the President lied after Kerry was in Cambodia.

Of these three possibilities, only one makes any sense...unless the swift boat had a TV on board and Kerry had access to network news.

The events could not have been coincident, nor does it make any sense that the lies were made prior to Kerry's experiences...which logically leaves only one possible scenario...that the President lied about troop presence after Kerry's experiences.

Since this is the only possible sequence of events...it makes sense that Kerry would have been speaking to that sequence.

You make it seem as though Kerry was tuning into the nightly news and was therefore coincidently outraged by the President's statements. As I have pointed out this scenario does not even make sense...so it is obvious that he was speaking of sequential events...events that may have been months apart...and he was speaking about them and what happened 20 years earlier.

Your insistence on precision from that vantage point is nonsense and without logic.

Orca
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext