Westergaard Writes:
<<<Nothing wrong with minutia as background and as a test of assumptions, but only after dealing with the basic question: "Does the product work?" To wallow around in matters such as whether or not training courses are full takes the investors eye off the ball.>>>
Hmmm,,, last time I checked the basic question "Does the Product Sell" was just as, or perhaps a little more important than the question "Does the Product Work". Lots of good, working products don't sell.
Fortunately, the forum of SI was set up in part, so we investors could share ideas and research, and not need to rely on "Paid Puff Pieces" produced by shills and promoters who act as though they are producing independent analysis.
Now, in our example of Premier, a smart investor could track the training classes to see how well the product was selling, because a dentist who buys a laser needs to be trained on how to operate the laser before he can use it.
Thus the question "Are the Training Classes Full" is not IMO "wallowing around", as you say, but rather getting right to the point of the matter -- "Is the Product Selling", and "Will the Company Produce Revenue and Profits."
I suggest you spend less time trying to promote yourself and your new network, and more time explaining what right you have to do great damage to my reputation and my business with your lies, which are exacerbated by offering a reward for information about me, which implies I am a criminal.
AND YOU HARM ME THIS WAY BECAUSE WHY? BECAUSE I PRESENT AN HONEST DISSENTING OPINION ABOUT A COMPANY YOU ARE PAID TO PROMOTE?
Your actions are DEPLORABLE.
Steve |
