The Castle Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (3661)	8/26/2004 9:58:07 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 7936

To often lately its become "lets pass/sign it", its popular (or I can trade my vote on this for support on some other issue), and the supreme court will strike it down anyway..." One of the people in this blog debate argued that it would be better if both/all sides of the political debate respected the constitution more but if your opponents are going to advance their agenda with unconstitutional laws or laws of questionable constitutionality that you had better do so as well or you cede control to them. I understand that argument but I can't really agree with the practice. What do you feel about the idea of an attorney general not arguing for a law that congress passed when it is up for revue in the courts if he and/or the president think it is unconstitutional? Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next