Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (64424)	8/27/2004 9:17:53 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) of 793824

<<<The Swiftee goal is to inform America that all is not as Kerry has said. They want to restore their own honor. They prefer Kerry not become Commander-in-Chief..>>> It is incumbent on all of us to find out as much as we can about anyone who is running for the office of the President and Commander-in-Chief. But tearing down the honor of someone who has won a silver star is not the way to go about it. Whether John John Kerry would make a good President is entirely a different matter. If he is as bad as you think he is, there would be many more legitimate issues that you could get him on. This discussion is having the effect of tarnishing all those that served honorably. We should not be going there - even if you say Kerry took us there. I have heard (and you can correct me on it) - there are many who have been heroic and deserving of a silver star, but have not got the recognition for it. It is not a citation that is easily obtained. Anyone that received one should not be questioned. Especially after thirty years and there is still no smoking gun. To question some one about a silver star without any evidence that the military can act upon is really dishonoring the military in the worst way possible.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next