Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (144247)	8/27/2004 1:38:16 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) of 281500

<He didn't quite win, however. A win would have been the rallying of the Shii population in an effort to unseat the sitting government and move for a Khomeni style take over. I am sure this is still on a 'to do' list.> You mean he did not win his "war" -- well wars are not usually won in a single battle. The question here is, did he win this battle? You can make a strong case that this was a decisive win for Sadr. And as for Sistani, Sadr is extremely useful to him. I put it to you that that Sistani can go to London, let Sadr do his thing, and then come back to let Sadr walk away free and clear, not because Sistani is trying to defuse Sadr, but on the contrary so that Sadr can do what would be beneath Sistani to do directly -- laying the groundwork for getting rid of "the Americans", including the current government which neither Sistani nor Sadr would see as having any legitimacy whatsoever. Who won the "war". We don't know yet, but in this battle the US clearly lost once again.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next