SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (198686)8/27/2004 2:58:40 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (3) of 1575173
 
Instead of responding point by point, I'll simplify things and say that you close to 100% wrong on most of what you say in your post and where any point is partially right you exaggerated it.

I will respond to this one question.

They where not. Even the conservative media didn't give him a free pass, and the liberal side of the media has been criticizing him since before Iraq.

Then why has paper after paper apologized for giving Bush a free pass?


They haven't apologized for "giving Bush a free pass". They have apologized for not being more skeptical about certain claims about Iraq and WMD.

1 - That is a far cry from totally giving Bush a free pass.

2 - If a number of papers where not sufficiently skeptical that doesn't mean Bush got a free pass even on this subset of one specific issue because other publications or news sources where more skeptical.

Bush doesn't "get a free pass" if a subset of news organizations isn't very skeptical about his claims in one area of one issue for a certain period of time. Bush would have gotten a free pass if all news and opinions sources accepted his version of the story, on all subsets of all issues all the time.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext