LOL! What lie? O'Neill was meeting the POTUS for the first
time in his life. He was unaware of Nixon's secret
recordings.
As O'Neill has said publicly, he immediately corrected himself after misstating that he was in Cambodia. He also explained how it was impossible to go into Cambodia on the canals & waterways he was patrolling at the time.
<font color=purple><font size=4>
"I was in Cambodia, sir. I worked along the border," <font color=black>
BTW, at that time (and after Kerry went home), we were now openly involved in Cambodia, with troops on the ground, etc.
Oh, FWIW, O'Neill never repeatedly lied about clandestine
trips into Cambodia. O'Neill never falsely claimed he had
been shot at by Vietnamese and Khmer Rouge and Cambodians,
and had the president of the United States telling the
American people that he was not there; the troops were not
in Cambodia ... that he had that memory which is "seared --
seared" -- in him.
And O'Neill never attempted to use multiple lies about
Cambodia for personal or political gain, like Kerry.
One more thing. Isn't it odd that you focus on this piss
poor stretch at claiming a lie, like it actually proves
something genuinely significant? Meanwhile, you show
absolutely no concern about an unrepentant liar like Kerry
who has had to retract his false Christmas in Cambodia
story - an event he claimed was "seared, seared" into him,
a literal turning point in his life - so much so that he
claimed it was a turning point for him against the war -
but it turns out this epiphany was a total fabrication
made up by Kerry for personal & political gain?
Who do you think you are kidding? |
