Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (65097)	8/28/2004 11:24:19 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) of 793905

is it expecting too much for Lipscomb to ask Lehman whether this might have been the standard practice in his office? It is standard practise and the documents are legal...unless they are repudiated by the signatory immediately when he becomes aware of them. Such is the case here. Lehman did not have knowledge...once he did he repudiated any documentation regarding Kerry's SS coming from his office and bearing his signature. That is how it was explained to me. Perhaps the legal beagles here can chime in. The key here is integrity. Kerry's SS citation was changed twice. That is beyond unusual...I mean we are talking Ripley museum stuuff here...You know...believe it or not. Lehman says he did not approve any change. End of story...Kerry doctored his SS citation twice. That makes it phony. Civilians may not understand this...But it is perfectly clear to veterans. I have spoken with several SS winners today. They are shocked beyond belief. But everyone responded the same way when I asked how many citations does it take to make one SS. They laughed and muttered something like that dumb FXXK. Then we talked. I even got an invite to the Son Tay Raider and POW reunion in November.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next