SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J.T. who wrote (18564)8/29/2004 6:09:10 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (2) of 19219
 
The policy of limiting what people can wear -- whether they can express their religious beliefs through their dress is an simply an issue of freedom. France clearly chose against freedom in the matter. That's all. It's not a matter of appeasement on the part of France that landed those news folk in the hands of the terorrists -- clearly it wasn't. Two things landed them in the hands of the terrorists. One, they were covering the war. Two, they had a government policy that appeared to target muslims.

Now in the US we have many confused as to what the founding fathers intended -- clearly they intended that government not encroach upon the free exercise of religious belief -- for those that emigrated to America -- the primary concern was to preclude the government from establishing a state religion -- BECAUSE it would interfere with "free exercise." But in the US, it is not much better than France because the a-religious, humanists, whatever -- these have twisted that around to allow the state the right to preclude many "public expressions or public free exercise."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext