Excellent summation of the points of contention between  the Swift vets and Kerry. Two parts. This should be your  reference for discussion. - From: LindyBill
  Precise Truth 
  Sunday, August 29, 2004
  Unfit for Command: SUPPORTING POINTS & AUTHORITIES (Vets 10, Shambo 0)
  Following are some of the major charges made against Hanoi John French Kerry by the SwiftVets, alongside supporting points and authorities, from Unfit for Command and other readily available documented sources on the internet and elsewhere: <font size=4> I. Kerry refuses to release official military and medical records (Unfit for Command pages 180-181)
  Kerry's campaign refuses to complete the simple Form 180 which would provide for the official & proper release of Kerry's military records and has sought to hide other records from the public and the press.
  1) Washington Post reports on August 22, 2004, <font color=blue>"Although Kerry campaign officials insist that they have published Kerry's full military records on their Web site (with the exception of medical records shown briefly to reporters earlier this year), they have not permitted independent access to his original Navy records. A Freedom of Information Act request by The Post for Kerry's records produced six pages of information. A spokesman for the Navy Personnel Command, Mike McClellan, said he was not authorized to release the full file, which consists of at least a hundred pages."<font color=black>
  2) In 2004 Michael Kranish of the Boston Globe discovered the Kerry campaign removed references to documents for January 26 + January 29, 1969, and up to 20 others, or more, from the official Kerry campaign web site.
  3) On May 4, 2004, over 250 swift boat veterans wrote a letter to Kerry asking him to file Form 180
  4) On August 18, 2004, August 25, 2004, and on other occasions, in official interviews, Kerry spokesman Michael Meehan was asked by various media reporters to complete Form 180 and he repeatedly declined to do so.
  5) On August 28, 2004, the Washington Post reported that historian Douglas Brinkley, author of John Kerry's authorized biography, Tour of Duty, now officially disputes Kerry's repeated assertions his document archives are under the sole control of Brinkley and cannot be released. Brinkley said, <font color=blue>"I don't mind if John Kerry shows anybody anything" and "If he wants to let anybody in, that's his business. Go bug John Kerry, and leave me alone."<font color=black>
  STATUS: <font color=green>Kerry's unwillingness to release his official records in this manner is truly unprecedented for a candidate seeking the office of President of the United States and Commander in Chief.<font color=black>
  II. Kerry avoided combat duty and officially joined the US Naval Reserve (like the National Guard) (Unfit for Command Chapter 1: The Reluctant Warrior)
  Contrary to the Kerry campaign assertions, Kerry sought deferment, faced draft, joined the Naval Reserves (similar to National Guard) and chose swift boats to avoid combat.
  1) Kerry admits in Brinkley's Tour of Duty, pages 370-373 that he decided to enlist after facing the draft and the navy formally refused to grant Kerry's requested deferment to study in Paris, France.
  2) US Navy Records confirm John F. Kerry enlisted in the United States Naval Reserves with initial status listed as <font color=blue>"inactive"<font color=black> on February 18, 1966.
  3) The Department of the Navy released a letter dated May 24, 1986, at Senator Kerry's request, specifying <font color=green>"18 Feb 1966: Enlisted as an OCSA (E-2), USNR (inactive)"<font color=black> - USNR = US Naval Reserves.
  4) Kerry campaign document <font color=green>"Enlistment Contract"<font color=black> confirms Kerry enlisted in "USNR-R", the US Naval Reserve
  5) Kerry campaign document <font color=green>"Service Record"<font color=black> shows Kerry was inducted and <font color=green>"D.O.R. as Ensign, USNR"<font color=black> (US Naval Reserve)
  6) In an interview with New York Times, April 23, 1971, <font color=blue>"An Angry War Veteran"<font color=black>, Kerry stated <font color=blue>"I wanted to go back and see for myself what was going on, but I didn't really want to get involved in the war."<font color=black> So late in 1968 he volunteered for an assignment on <font color=green>"swift boats"<font color=black> - the short, fast aluminum craft that were then used for patrol duty off the coast of Viet Nam."
  7) Kerry also admitted the same to the Boston Globe, <font color=blue>"Kerry initially hoped to continue his service at a relatively safe distance from most fighting, securing an assignment as <font color=green>"swift boat"<font color=blue> skipper. While the 50-foot swift boats cruised the Vietnamese coast a little closer to the action than the Gridley had come, they were still considered relatively safe. "I didn't really want to get involved in the war," Kerry said in a little-noticed contribution to a book of Vietnam reminiscences published in 1986. "When I signed up for the swift boats, they had very little to do with the war. They were engaged in coastal patrolling and that's what I thought I was going to be doing." <font color=black>
  8) Kery campaign document <font color=green>"Duty Recommendation"<font color=black> confirms Kerry <font color=green>"desires Swift boat billet"<font color=black> and that he was also <font color=green>"Interested in Language School", emphasizing Kerry <font color=blue>"Speak(s) French fluently."<font color=black>
  9) Kerry spoke with Harvard Crimson In a February 18, 1970 article, John Kerry: <font color=blue>A Navy Dove Runs for Congress , "At Yale, Kerry was chairman of the Political Union and later, as Commencement speaker, urged the United States to withdraw from Vietnam and to scale down foreign military operations. And this was way back in 1966. When he approached his draft board for permission to study for a year in Paris, the draft board refused and Kerry decided to enlist in the Navy."<font color=black>
  10) The Crimson interview & Kerry's statements were re-confirmed with the original reporter, Samuel Goldhaber, on July, 3 2004 by Charles Laurence of the UK Telegraph who reports <font color=green>"the revelation appears to undercut Sen Kerry's carefully-cultivated image as a man who willingly served his country in a dangerous war" and notes "at no point did Kerry contact either me or the Crimson to dispute anything I (Goldhaber) had written." (Revealed: how 'war hero' Kerry tried to put off Vietnam military duty)<font color=black>
  11) In a June 15, 2003 article <font color=blue>"A privileged youth, a taste for risk"<font color=black>, the favored Boston Globe reporters wrote: <font color=blue> ...As graduation approached, Kerry knew that he had three choices: be drafted, seek a deferment for graduate school, or join up and position himself to become an officer. ``It was clear to me that I was going to be at risk,'' Kerry recalled. ``My draft board . . . said, `Look, the likelihood is you are probably going to be drafted.' I said, `If I'm going to be drafted, I'd like to have responsibility and be an officer.' ''   At the same time, Kerry was losing interest in academics and was ready for adventure. ``I cut classes,'' Kerry said. ``I didn't do much. I spent a lot of time learning to fly.'' 
  Kerry also had political ambitions -- and was aware of how much military service had served John Kennedy's career. ``John would clearly say, `If I could make my dream come true, it would be running for president of the United States,' '' recalled William Stanberry, Kerry's debate team partner for three years. ``It was not a casual interest. It was a serious, stated interest. His lifetime ambition was to be in political office.''  <font color=black> 12) Kerry's naval records state he was discharged <font color=green>"from the United States Naval Reserve as a Lieutenant (O-3)"<font color=black>
  13) Kerry campaign documents <font color=green>"Honorable Discharge From Reserve" and "Acceptance of Discharge confirms Kerry was officially discharged from the US Naval Reserve.<font color=black>
  STATUS: <font color=green>To date the Kerry campaign has not chosen to dispute his prior statements or any of the official records which have been made available to the public.<font color=black>
  III. Kerry's military experience was not as it's being portrayed in presidential campaign (Unfit for Command Chapter 1: The Reluctant Warrior)
  Contrary to Kerry campaign's presentations, Kerry spent only a few months in Vietnam, was never <font color=green>"shot"<font color=black>, and reenacted scenes now used in presidential campaign advertising including his official convention video directed by Steven Spielberg protégé James Smoll.
  1) Kerry's first year's service, from June 1967 to June 1968, was spent on a frigate, the USS Gridley, which spent much of that period patrolling off the coast of California.
  2) Kerry's campaign military records show he was (falsely) awarded a Vietnam Service Medal which required at least six months combat duty in Vietnam.
  3) Kerry arrived at camp in Vietnam for one month of training at Cam Ranh Bay on November 17, 1968.
  4) Navy records on Kerry campaign site & his own personal accounts in Tour of Duty and elsewhere confirm Kerry left Vietnam and arrived home on March 17, 1969.
  5) No records yet made public or any official account ever refer to Kerry being shot - any of his purported wounds involved minor accidents with self-inflicted shrapnel.
  6) Kerry admitted to buying his Super-8 movie camera at the PX in Cam Ranh Bay and also admitted to faking reenactment of events in the October 6, 1996 article, <font color=blue>"THE MAKING OF THE CANDIDATES: JOHN FORBES KERRY OFTEN TAGGED AS A POLITICAL OPPORTUNIST"<font color=black> by reporter Charles Sennott of the Boston Globe. Kerry showed him footage including a reenactment at the area where the Silver Star incident took place and exclaimed, <font color=blue>"I'll show you were they shot from. See? That's the hole covered up with reeds."<font color=black>. Also recounted in National Review
  7) The Boston Globe further reported, <font color=blue>"The Kerry home movies revealed something indelible about the man who shot them. The tall, thin, handsome naval officer seen striding through the reeds in flak jacket and helmet, hold aloft the captured B-40 rocket. The young man so unconscious of risk in the heat of battle, yet so focused on his future ambitions, that he would reenact the moment for film. It is as if he had cast himself in the sequel to the experience of his hero, John F. Kennedy, on the PT-109". Thomas Vallely, one of Kerry's closest political advisers and friends, also told the Globe, "John was thinking Camelot when he shot that film, absolutely."<font color=black>
  8) Kerry campaign commercials, videos, photographs and the official biography Tour of Duty by Douglas Brinkley include, among other various reenactments, <font color=blue>"a staged clip of Kerry in 1969 as an infantryman in Vietnam, in bandoliers (and violating Rule Number One of the infantry, by pointing his weapon down)"<font color=black>. (Unfit for Command page 181)
  9) Other observable factual discrepancies include Kerry's video depictions of himself armed with any number of hand grenades hanging from the flak jacket he's wearing, given Swift Boat policy was to never allow such on the boats because of the potential accidents or ricochet which could result by lobbing one from the deck.
  STATUS: <font color=green>To date the Kerry campaign has not chosen to dispute his prior statements or any of the official records which have been made available to the public.<font color=black>
  IV. Kerry faked & falsified 1st Purple Heart (Unfit for Command pages 31-41)
  Kerry's alleged wound, a small 1-2 cm piece of M-79 grenade shrapnel, was accidentally self-inflicted, not involving enemy combat, resulted in only a minor scratch (described as equivalent of a rose thorn prick), did not meet official regulations and was formally rejected by his superior & commanding officers.
  1) Kerry's diary and book Tour of Duty indicates there was no enemy combat involved (Washington Times 8/25/04 Diary refutes Kerry's other claims that it did)
  2) Official Criteria for a Purple Heart confirm Kerry's lack of eligibility
  3) Attending physician Leo Letson, who has sworn an affidavit and appeared on the first SwiftVet advertisement, confirms alleged wound shrapnel was due to a small M-79 grenade fragment only 1-2 cm in size, unquestionably not worthy, only treated with a band-aid, & personally rejected Kerry's request for a Purple Heart; Kerry campaign suggests only the nurse who signed the standard report for the doctor was the only one who ever saw Kerry.
  4) Now retired Rear Admiral and senior JAG officer William Schachte, who was present and in command of the mission as John Kerry's superior officer at the time, has now made a statement also speaks elsewhere to having berated Kerry <font color=purple>"for almost putting someone's eye out"<font color=black> and on August 27, 2004, told the NY Post Kerry wasn't wounded by hostile fire, wasn't even under fire by the enemy at the time and that he <font color=purple>"nicked"<font color=black> himself with a grenade launcher and <font color=purple>"requested a Purple Heart"<font color=black> afterward. and also told Lisa Myers of NBC News on August 27, 2004 that <font color=purple>"it was an accident"<font color=black>.
  5) Kerry's then Commanding Officer Grant Hibbard confirms he refused Kerry's pleas requesting he be awarded a Purple Heart. Hibbard describes the wound he was shown by Kerry as <font color=purple>"a scratch"<font color=black>, adding <font color=purple>"I've seen worse injuries from a rose thorn. ... Kerry wasn't getting any Purple Heart recommendation from me"<font color=black> (Unfit for Command pages 37-38).
  6) No official incident reports for the action were - purposely - ever filed by all of Kerry's superior + commanding officers (because of the dubious severity, self-inflicted nature and the fact it did not involve any enemy fire)
  7) On April 14, 2004, <font color=blue>Kerry refused to be interviewed about this incident with Boston Globe reporter Michael Kranish: Kerry faces questions over Purple Heart<font color=black>
  8) Kerry campaign now admits to the potential wound was accidental & self-inflicted (Major Garrett / Video)
  9) Submissions for Kerry's Purple Heart were first made three months after the incident; and the Kerry campaign has yet to file the Form 180 which would allow for the public release of all these documents and the required supporting materials including affidavits and appropriate recommendations.
  10) In prior interview with USA Today in 2004, Kerry admitted he may have personally requested the Purple Heart and recalled <font color=blue>"someone raising a question"<font color=black> about it.
  11) <font color=blue>Kerry campaign now admits Kerry completed the paperwork for himself<font color=black>
  STATUS: <font color=green>Given Kerry campaign's stated admissions and refusal to sign 180 for release of additional records, it is increasingly clear this Purple Heart was gamed by Kerry. <font color=black> V. Sampan Incident (Unfit for Command pages 53-62)
  A tragic incident involving John Kerry's reported negligence and incompetence results in the killing of a young boy and his father in a small boat with Kerry submitting false after reports to avoid inevitable disciplinary action.
  1) Kerry himself admits to the killing of the child on pages 269-270 of Doug Brinkley's Tour of Duty.
  2) Steven Gardner, former crewmate of Kerry's who spent more time on John Kerry's boat than any other crew member and was present on the mission and the gunner at the time, learned of & identifies the discrepancies in his sworn testimony summarized on pages 56-57 of Unfit for Command
  3) Original after-action report uncovered by Boston Globe revealing Kerry reported multiple Viet Cong enemy KIA, 5000 lbs. of <font color=blue>"contraband" <font color=black>(the equivalent weight of an automobile being carried on the small Sampan) and no mention whatsoever of the child who was killed.
  4) Kerry's former Division Commander George Elliot confirmed he received the false report Kerry submitted and was - for years - unaware of the true circumstances of the incident nor that involved the death of a young boy.
  5) John Hurley, head of Vietnam Veterans for Kerry and former associate in VVAW, declined to challenge Gardner's account of this incident nor the accompanying records documentation during debate on MSNBC / Scarborough Country 8/20/04.
  STATUS: <font color=green>Given the evidence, eyewitness testimony & documents revealed, combined with the Kerry campaign's unwillingness to even dispute the SwiftVet's account of these specific actions, it is certain that John Kerry did indeed fraudulently falsify the official documents he submitted in this matter.
  .....continued ...... |