Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (65515)	8/30/2004 12:12:19 PM
From: aladin	Read Replies (1) of 794197

No. I don't think eugenics has anything to do with this. I don't know why you would infer that it does. Planned Parenthood's founder was a Eugenics promoter. Margaret Sanger didn't want lots of unfit (ie minority) children. Her writings were very popular in Germany at the time. Or why you would resort to such hyperbole. The question you thought required a serious answer was not serious - it was simply a political slogan. Do you disagree with my assumption that wanted and afforded children are more likely to become productive members of society than unwanted, unafforded ones and that if you increase the numbers of unwanted ones you will have greater societal problems that will need to be dealt with? This assumes a constant rate of pregnancy and that no other options exist. For example - plenty of people wait on adoption, regardless of race or background. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next