Neo-Nazis, KKK and Emile Vidrine - (for my files)
Emile Vidrine's behavior is every bit as hostile to Christianity as the very worst of people.
1. He constantly posts a bogus article against Jews allegedly written by Churchill. The article is found here fpp.co.uk.
2. The article comes from David Irving. Indeed the above URL is to Irving’s website. Irving was made infamous not too long ago because he sued an academic who called him a historical revisionist. Irving lost his case because he supports Neo-Nazism by taking history and then rewriting it to support a pro-Nazi agenda. He is one of the guys who denies the Holocaust. guardian.co.uk
3. Vidrine is a David Duke supporter. Duke is the infamous former leader of the KKK, now a racist politician in Vidrine’s home state of Louisiana. siliconinvestor.com
4. This information proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Vidrine doesn’t just hate Talmudic Jews. He hates all ethnic Jews. His support of Neo-Nazis, his constant posting of their trash here, never with links, prove he is no Christian. A Christian would state what he believes is true and would not hide anything. Vidrine hides. He always hides the real source of his bile. Do a Google search on the content of his posts and you will find they almost always come from Neo-Nazis and are rarely, if ever, legitimate. Message 20467274
Humans have a natural right to be all that nature has made them. No one has a right to use law or any other force against any person or group based upon innate passive characteristics. To do such a thing is logically anti-human because there is no single passive innate human characteristic that is not shared by all humans to some degree. We all are essentially the same biological value in nature. So if there is morality, we must all possess the same moral value. No one human has the natural right to infringe upon any other by any means.
Laws should only forbid inhuman behaviors, behaviors that infringe upon the natural freedom of others. So then if Jews have the intellect and resources to purchase every single media outlet in the world without falsely taking their resources from others, then it is perfectly fine in nature. If city hall is completely dominated by blacks who got their positions without falsely taking them, then in civilized human society this is without doubt a completely noble thing. If whites control every single ounce of gold and silver on the planet, this, without ever having harmed the natural rights of others, then there is just not a single problem with it under the sun.
But if anyone should pass laws against nature-- if anyone should, for example, erect legal partitions between people based upon passive innate characteristics when the obvious fact is that there are no biological partitions between people at all, then I have no choice but to be that person’s bitter enemy. That person is against my own nature. Humans, all of them, must be free to make their own choices, to live as they wish under the laws that spell out human nature.
I stand against Vidrine, SeachRE, Doren, this Rodman clown and anyone else who supports their trash because I wish to see the natural art of people expressing themselves without infringement. We all have a right to see this before we die. |
