SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TideGlider who wrote (615273)8/31/2004 7:54:17 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
"Yep, the SS is a scary scheme ...it will implode on it's own."

Yep, but the timing is somewhat adjustable.

If the government were not using the HUGE inflow of annual SS receipts into the general budget right now to hide the TRUE size of the current deficits --- then, believe it or not, despite the demographic problems caused ('predictably', I'd add) by the Baby Boomer Bulge that's coming --- the SS program itself would not run negative until well past the middle of this Century... and then by a fairly smallish percentage.

Unlike most of the 'Developed World' (Japan, Europe, etc.) our population is still growing at a far clip (about the same population growth percentage as China now, I think... maybe more) because, same as per usual, of our large imigration rates.

What's approaching extremely SERIOUS financial imbalance now though --- with fiscal problems much worse then SS --- is Medicare/Medicaid.

With better then a half Trillion dollar cost added to the program (first 10 years) because of the new drug benefit... and with pharmaceutical costs rising double digits each year, as they have for a number of years now, Medicare is scheduled to go bust right around 2019 I think.

Only by lumping Medicare and SS together does the SS problem appear more immanent.

(PS --- I've always believed that the best retirement system for the US would be one where most of the worker contributions went into true investment accounts... not simply signed over to the government (who then hands what's needed over to current receipents and keeps the difference), especially since the average 'ROI' for money paid into SS has averaged around 1.5%.

Chile, for example, made a move to a payed-in retirement system in the early 1970s, and has had great success.

But the problem has always been that no Pol here could ever afford to propose the generation-long pain of paying for a transition to a (better) investment-based system.

If Bush proposes this Thursday night though... he will have to explain where the estimated Trillion dollars in transition costs are going to come from. Not exactly easy when you are running around 1/2 Trillion dollar deficits into the forseeable future....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext