Rock_nj > There is no evidence that Bush&Co. ordered Osama bin Laden -- who had been on the CIA payroll in Afghanistan when he and his forces were battling the Soviet occupiers -- to launch terrorist attacks on the U.S. Resurgent radical Islam is a genuine phenomenon, with its own religious and political roots. There definitely are Bad Guys out there.
Yes, there are Bad Guys out there and yes, there is no evidence that Bush & Co ordered bin Laden to attack the US. However, there is evidence that a covert relationship between bin Laden and the US continued after the mujahideen helped to rid Afghanistan of the Soviet incursion. I refer here to Kosovo and to the arming by the US of the KLA while bin Laden was also actively engaged in furthering its aims. And this is only a few years before 9/11 took place. On this basis it is perfectly clear, to me at any rate, that it has been the deliberate policy of the US for many years, and in fact long before the Bush administration came to power, to align itself with radical Islam (Muslim fundamentalism) in the furtherance of its own aims. As you know, we are told that the US/bin Laden relationship soured recently but who really knows?
As far as 9/11 is concerned, there are two main reasons why I believe what happened is not as we were told:
1. On the basis of the cui bono hypothesis, 9/11 was the trigger for the implementation of the PNAC manifesto to create an American Empire, starting in the Mid-East. Some might say it was fortuitous. I believe it was deliberate. Why this is relevant is that most of the authors of the PNAC document are connected to the Pentagon and are therefore in a position to implement their own agenda.
2. As you know, there are many unanswered questions about 9/11 itself but, to me, the "smoking gun", if I may call it that, is the overwhelming evidence that the WTC was destroyed by controlled demolition. I do not deny that there may have been "terrorist" hijacking of the aircraft which were involved, but, by no stretch of the imagination, is that the end of the story. Further, the cover-up by the official 9/11 Commission of these and other important facts is also indicative of a conspiracy at the highest level.
Yes, we did not see Bush & Co actually ordering bin Laden to strike but, there is a smoking gun in their hands, money in their pockets -- and smiles on their faces! And yes, we have only their word that is was bin Laden who struck! There is no real evidence for it. And, he denies it.
And, I might ask, why were the five Israelis dancing and cheering as they witnessed and took videos of the heinous events which occurred on 9/11? How could they have possibly known what was happening unless they were involved? |
